Regional forecast API for Great Britain's grid carbon intensity and generation mix.
- Pricing
- Free
- Category
- Carbon-Aware Computing
- Compliance
- Not stated
Use case
How to evaluate solar resource and production forecasting tools for project design, financing and day-ahead operations.
Solar yield forecasting covers two different purchases that are often confused. Developers and financiers need a long-term energy estimate to size a plant and structure debt, usually expressed as P50 and P90 production over the project life. Asset managers and grid operators need short-term forecasts of generation for the next hours or days, to schedule maintenance, manage storage and meet dispatch or imbalance obligations.
The input data decides the quality of both. Long-term assessment depends on satellite or reanalysis irradiance datasets, their period of record, bias correction against ground measurements and assumptions about interannual variability. Operational forecasting depends on numerical weather predictions, their update cadence and spatial resolution, plus a model of the plant's configuration and losses. Snow, soiling, curtailment, availability and degradation all have to be represented explicitly rather than hidden in a single uncertainty figure.
Failures are easy to spot in hindsight. A yield estimate built on one favourable year, a P90 that is simply P50 minus a fixed percentage, a forecast vendor that cannot report historical error against actual production, or a model that cannot be recalibrated once the plant is energised. Financiers have learned to ask for the assumptions behind the number, and operators increasingly ask the same of short-term forecasts.
Evaluate tools on source data and period, uncertainty methodology, editable loss assumptions, forecast horizon and cadence, measured accuracy and recalibration with operating data. The directory is still expanding its coverage of PV asset tooling; the entries listed here are the closest energy and grid-data tools available today, not PV forecasting products.
Resource dataset and period of record
Identify the satellite or reanalysis source, the years covered, spatial and temporal resolution, and whether the dataset is bias-corrected against nearby ground measurements or accepted as published.
Uncertainty and P50/P90 method
Ask how interannual variability, model uncertainty and measurement uncertainty are combined, how P90 is derived, and whether the assumptions are documented well enough for a lender's technical adviser.
Editable loss and system assumptions
Soiling, snow, mismatch, wiring, inverter efficiency, availability, curtailment and degradation should be adjustable with defaults shown, so the buyer can test the sensitivity of the yield estimate.
Forecast horizon and update cadence
For operational use, check whether forecasts are day-ahead or intraday, how often they update, latency to delivery, spatial resolution, and whether the API can feed dispatch or storage scheduling.
Measured forecast accuracy
Require historical error metrics against actual production, such as MAE, RMSE and bias by site and season, rather than a single accuracy claim, and ask how errors are reported when a site has missing data.
Recalibration with operating data
Once the plant is running, the model should ingest meter or SCADA data, compare predicted and actual output, and keep versioned runs so changes in yield estimates can be traced and explained.
Regional forecast API for Great Britain's grid carbon intensity and generation mix.
Open-source Web API and CLI for shifting software to lower-carbon times and regions.
Last verified 2026-10-22. Figures on the linked tools are checked against the sources above; confirm pricing and compliance coverage before signing.